From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Clayman

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Feb 22, 2006
186 N.J. 73 (N.J. 2006)

Opinion

February 22, 2006


ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 05-278, concluding that ERIC J. CLAYMAN of AUDUBON, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1985, should be censured for violating RPC 3.3(a)(1) (making false statements of material fact to a tribunal), RPC 3.3(a)(2) (assisting client in a fraud), RPC 3.3(a)(5) (failure to disclose to a tribunal a material fact with knowledge that the tribunal may tend to be misled by such failure), RPC 4.1(a)(1) and (2) (false statements of material fact to third persons and failure to disclose material facts to a third person when disclosure is necessary to avoid assisting a fraudulent act by the client), RPC 8.4(c) (conduct involving dishonesty, deceit, fraud or misrepresentation), RPC 8.4(d) (conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that ERIC J. CLAYMAN is hereby censured; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent's file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.


Summaries of

In re Clayman

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Feb 22, 2006
186 N.J. 73 (N.J. 2006)
Case details for

In re Clayman

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF ERIC J. CLAYMAN, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: Feb 22, 2006

Citations

186 N.J. 73 (N.J. 2006)
891 A.2d 615

Citing Cases

In re Shin

On February 2, 2011, based on the referee's findings, the New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second…

United States v. Altro

279, 69 C 245 12/14/71-12/20/71 U.S. v. William Brown, 70 CR 271 12/21/71-12/30/71 U.S. v. DeBlasi, 70 CR…