From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Chestnut

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Jun 23, 2017
No. 17-1223 (4th Cir. Jun. 23, 2017)

Opinion

No. 17-1223

06-23-2017

In Re: RAYMOND EDWARD CHESTNUT, a/k/a Snoop, a/k/a Ray, Petitioner.

Raymond Edward Chestnut, Petitioner Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
(4:05-cr-01044-RBH-1; 4:16-cv-02013-RBH) Before SHEDD, WYNN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Raymond Edward Chestnut, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Raymond Edward Chestnut petitions for a writ of mandamus, seeking to compel the district court to act on his Motion to Vacate Stay Order. Our review of the district court's docket reveals that the district court has denied the motion. Accordingly, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED


Summaries of

In re Chestnut

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Jun 23, 2017
No. 17-1223 (4th Cir. Jun. 23, 2017)
Case details for

In re Chestnut

Case Details

Full title:In Re: RAYMOND EDWARD CHESTNUT, a/k/a Snoop, a/k/a Ray, Petitioner.

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Jun 23, 2017

Citations

No. 17-1223 (4th Cir. Jun. 23, 2017)