In re Bacon

2 Citing briefs

  1. IN RE M.M.

    Respondent’s Opening Brief on the Merits

    Filed March 22, 2010

    ) The attorney arguedthat the amendment was necessary because courts were mistakenly concludingthat police officers were public officers. As an example, he cited In re Bacon (1966) 240 Cal.App.2d 34, where the Court of Appeal concluded University of California police officers were public officers. (/d. at p. 54.)

  2. IN RE M.M.

    Respondent’s Request for Judicial Notice

    Filed July 21, 2010

    ] STAPF COMMENTS: Co@ifies ExistingPractice, Commonly referred to as the crime of "resisting arrest", Section 148 of the Penal Code has long been inter- oreted tc apply to "peace officers" as well as public officers. {See In re, Bacon (1966) 240 Cal. App. 2d 34 and use nete toe CALJIC 16.100 which states that the term public officer includes those persons des- lgnateé as peace officers pursuant to Sections §30 through 830.9 of the Penal Code.}j Therefore, this bill makes no substantive chenge in the law.