From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Holt v. State

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
Jan 16, 2015
No. 05-14-00914-CR (Tex. App. Jan. 16, 2015)

Opinion

No. 05-14-00914-CR

01-16-2015

CODY JOHN HOLT, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee


On Appeal from the 59th Judicial District Court Grayson County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 062011

ORDER

The Court ORDERS the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine why appellant's brief has not been filed. In this regard, the trial court shall make appropriate findings and recommendations and determine whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeal, whether appellant is indigent, or if not indigent, whether retained counsel has abandoned the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b). If the trial court cannot obtain appellant's presence at the hearing, the trial court shall conduct the hearing in appellant's absence. See Meza v. State, 742 S.W.2d 708 (Tex. App.-Corpus Christi 1987, no pet.) (per curiam). If appellant is indigent, the trial court is ORDERED to take such measures as may be necessary to assure effective representation, which may include appointment of new counsel.

We ORDER the trial court to transmit a record of the proceedings, which shall include written findings and recommendations, to this Court within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this order.

This appeal is ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with the above order. The appeal shall be reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the findings are received, whichever is earlier.

/s/ LANA MYERS

JUSTICE


Summaries of

Holt v. State

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
Jan 16, 2015
No. 05-14-00914-CR (Tex. App. Jan. 16, 2015)
Case details for

Holt v. State

Case Details

Full title:CODY JOHN HOLT, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

Date published: Jan 16, 2015

Citations

No. 05-14-00914-CR (Tex. App. Jan. 16, 2015)