Not overruled or negatively treated on appealinfoCoverage
Court of Appeals of KentuckyMay 9, 1969
439 S.W.2d 579 (Ky. Ct. App. 1969)

Cases citing this case

How cited

  • Sparkman v. McFarlin

    …This view is supported by the fact that the cases cited by the A.L. court all held that, in the absence of…

  • Matter of C.D.M

    …Incapacitated persons such as C.D.M. are generally incapable of giving effective legal consent to such…

lock 20 Citing caseskeyboard_arrow_right

December 13, 1968. Rehearing Denied May 9, 1969.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Whitley County, Pleas Jones, J.

Eugene Siler, Jr., Williamsburg, for appellants.

J.B. Johnson, Jr., Williamsburg, for appellee.

This, to say the least, is an unusual case. The appellants, county health officer and local medical society of Whitley County, seek a declaratory judgment to the effect that they can sterilize the appellee, a 35-year-old unmarried woman who is mentally retarded and has two illegitimate children (one of whom also is retarded), without civil or criminal liability to themselves. They appeal from an adjudication that they "cannot legally perform a sexual sterilization operation upon the defendant because the defendant is not mentally competent to grant permission and there is no legal authority providing for the granting of such permission in any manner."

There simply is no escape from the conclusion reached by the trial court. If, as alleged and proved, the appellee is in fact mentally incompetent, she does not have legal capacity to consent to anything. Nor, at her age, does the law give her parents any control of her person or property. It may be (though we do not decide) that a legally constituted committee could exercise such a choice, but there has been no inquest and there is no committee. The guardian ad litem has, of course, only the power to defend, which he has done. And neither by statute nor from the common law does any court of this state have authority to fill the void.

The judgment is affirmed.

All concur.

An alternative to Lexis that does not break the bank.

Casetext does more than Lexis for less than $65 per month.