From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Holland v. Baguette, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Mar 21, 1989
540 So. 2d 197 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

Opinion

No. 88-767.

March 21, 1989.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Dade County, David Tobin, J.

Highsmith, Strauss Glatzer and Neil Rose, Miami, for appellant.

Blackwell, Walker, Fascell Hoehl and James E. Tribble and Kathleen M. Salyer, Parenti Falk and Norman M. Waas, Miami, for appellees.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and NESBITT and BASKIN, JJ.


We reverse the final summary judgment entered for the defendants in this trip-and-fall case on the authority of Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. v. Kimmel, 465 So.2d 606 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985). First, here as in Kimmel, the accident occurred in a public place, not in a private home as in Schoen v. Gilbert, 436 So.2d 75 (Fla. 1983); consequently, the facts are distinguishable from those of Schoen. Second, the affidavit of plaintiff's engineer supported the allegation that the step over which the plaintiff tripped was built in violation of the South Florida Building Code. If proven, this would constitute prima facie evidence of negligence. See Cadillac Fairview of Fla., Inc. v. Cespedes, 468 So.2d 417 (Fla. 3d DCA), review denied, 479 So.2d 117 (Fla. 1985); Grand Union Co. v. Rocker, 454 So.2d 14 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984). Accordingly, because genuine issues of material fact remain to be resolved, it was error to enter summary judgment.

REVERSED.


Summaries of

Holland v. Baguette, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Mar 21, 1989
540 So. 2d 197 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)
Case details for

Holland v. Baguette, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:LOLA E. HOLLAND, APPELLANT, v. BAGUETTE, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION D/B/A…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Mar 21, 1989

Citations

540 So. 2d 197 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

Citing Cases

Standard Jury Instructions-Civil Cases

NOTE ON USE This charge is to be used for the violation of both traffic and nontraffic regulations,…

Spadafora v. Carlo

The Carlos recognize that a violation of the building code is evidence of a breach of the standard of care in…