From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hinson v. Hussey

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Feb 24, 2021
No. 3D19-1982 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Feb. 24, 2021)

Opinion

No. 3D19-1982

02-24-2021

Takira T. Hinson, Appellant, v. Detrick L. Hussey, Appellee.

Law Offices of Slesnick and Casey, LLP, and James C. Casey, for appellant. No appearance for appellee.1


Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. Lower Tribunal No. 18-1424 An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Jason E. Dimitris, Judge. Law Offices of Slesnick and Casey, LLP, and James C. Casey, for appellant. No appearance for appellee. Before FERNANDEZ, HENDON and GORDO, JJ. PER CURIAM.

Appellee was precluded from filing an answer brief after failing to heed this Court's order directing him to file same within a specified period of time. --------

Affirmed. See Trice v. Trice, 267 So. 3d 496, 499 (Fla. 2d DCA 2019) ("[T]he movant must show 'that there has been a change in circumstances since the injunction was entered' such 'that the scenario underlying the injunction no longer exists so that the continuation of the injunction would serve no valid purpose.'" (quoting Spaulding v. Shane, 150 So. 3d 852, 853 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014))); Alkhoury v. Alkhoury, 54 So. 3d 641, 642 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011) (same); Simonik v. Patterson, 752 So. 2d 692, 692-93 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000) ("The trial court has broad discretion in granting, denying, dissolving, or modifying injunctions, and, unless a clear abuse of discretion is demonstrated, appellate courts will not disturb the trial court's decision.").


Summaries of

Hinson v. Hussey

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Feb 24, 2021
No. 3D19-1982 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Feb. 24, 2021)
Case details for

Hinson v. Hussey

Case Details

Full title:Takira T. Hinson, Appellant, v. Detrick L. Hussey, Appellee.

Court:Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Date published: Feb 24, 2021

Citations

No. 3D19-1982 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Feb. 24, 2021)