Hill
v.
Ark. Dep't of Human Servs.

This case is not covered by Casetext's citator
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth CircuitNov 8, 2018
No. 18-1379 (8th Cir. Nov. 8, 2018)

No. 18-1379

11-08-2018

Phyllis L. Hill Plaintiff - Appellant v. Arkansas Department of Human Services; Claudette W. Holt; David Tures; John Parke; Kelton Phillips; Lacey Wynes; Terri Jones; Anthony Tony Gilbert, Sr.; Timothy Lampe; Job Serebrov; Rowena Reyes; Walter Barrington; Doe, Arkansas Claims Commissioner Defendants - Appellees


Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Little Rock [Unpublished] Before WOLLMAN, GRUENDER, and STRAS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM.

Phyllis Hill appeals from the district court's grant of judgment for defendants, the Arkansas Department of Human Services (ADHS) and numerous ADHS employees, on her claims of retaliation under Title VII.

The Honorable Brian S. Miller, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas. --------

We conclude upon de novo review that the district court did not err in dismissing Hill's claims against the individual defendants, see Plymouth Cty. v. Merscorp., Inc., 774 F.3d 1155, 1158-59 (8th Cir. 2014) (standard of review); Bales v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 143 F.3d 1103, 1111 (8th Cir. 1998) (no individual supervisor liability under Title VII); or in granting summary judgment in favor of ADHS, see Musolf v. J.C. Penney Co., 773 F.3d 916, 918 (8th Cir. 2014) (standard of review; plaintiff must show causal connection between materially adverse employment action and protected conduct). We find no other basis for reversal.

The judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.