Opinion
2014-05-14
Blustein, Shapiro, Rich & Barone, LLP, Goshen, N.Y. (Jay R. Morrow of counsel), for appellant. Mitchell Troyetsky, New York, N.Y., for respondent.
Blustein, Shapiro, Rich & Barone, LLP, Goshen, N.Y. (Jay R. Morrow of counsel), for appellant. Mitchell Troyetsky, New York, N.Y., for respondent.
In an action, inter alia, to enforce a restrictive covenant, the defendant Karen Bryant appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Bartlett, J.), dated February 8, 2012, as denied those branches of her motion which were for summary judgment dismissing the fourth and fifth causes of action and granted the plaintiff's cross motion for summary judgment on those causes of action.
ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, without costs.
The appeal from the order must be dismissed because the right of direct appeal therefrom terminated with the entry of judgment in the action ( see Matter of Aho, 39 N.Y.2d 241, 248, 383 N.Y.S.2d 285, 347 N.E.2d 647). The issues raised on the appeal from the order are brought up for review and have been considered on the companion appeal from the judgment ( see Hidalgo v. 4–34–68, Inc., –––A.D.3d ––––, ––– N.Y.S.2d ––––, 2014 WL 1910447 [Appellate Division Docket No. 2013–03511; decided herewith] ). ENG, P.J., RIVERA, HALL and LOTT, JJ., concur.