Hicks
v.
State

Not overruled or negatively treated on appealinfoCoverage
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division OneAug 31, 1993
860 S.W.2d 392 (Mo. Ct. App. 1993)

No. 63342.

August 31, 1993.

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ST. LOUIS COUNTY; MARGARET NOLAN, JUDGE.

Dave Hemingway, St. Louis, for defendant-movant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., F. Martin Dajani, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for plaintiff-respondent.

Before CRANDALL, P.J., and REINHARD and CRIST, JJ.


ORDER


Movant, John Hicks, appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. The judgment of conviction sought to be vacated was for stealing a motor vehicle for which movant was sentenced on his plea of guilty to imprisonment for three years.

The judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous; no error of law appears. An opinion would have no precedential value.

The judgment of the motion court is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).