Filed July 27, 2015
Plaintiffs cannot recover fees for duplicative work, such as having multiple timekeepers independently circulate each ECF notice, or duplicating deposition preparation or summaries of depositions or hearings. Herrington v. Cnty. of Sonoma, 883 F.2d 739, 747 (9th Cir. 1989).25 See NCAA Opp., Dkt. 355 at 18-19.
Filed February 6, 2015
Case4:09-cv-03329-CW Document355 Filed02/06/15 Page24 of 32 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 19 DEFENDANT NCAA’S OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS’ AMENDED MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES, COSTS AND EXPENSES Case No. 09-cv-3329-CW counsel necessitates a reduction of the hours claimed. Herrington v. Cnty. of Sonoma, 883 F.2d 739, 747 (9th Cir. 1989); Cruz, 601 F. Supp. 2d at 1191-92. Exhibits 29 and 30 identify the redundant billing entries.
Filed February 23, 2011
RENEWED MOTION FOR JMOL AND NEW TRIAL MOTION Case No. 07-CV-1658 PJH (EDL) vacated where it is “so grossly excessive that it shock[s] the conscience.” Herrington v. County of Sonoma, 883 F.2d 739, 741 (9th Cir. 1989). In determining whether damages are excessive, “the [c]ourt must focus on evidence of the qualitative harm suffered by plaintiff.”
Filed June 10, 2010
Consequently, recovery under the ADA is the rule rather than the exception. Jbid. citing Herrington v. County of Sonoma, 883 F.2d 739, 743 (9th Cir. 1989). This is, incidentally, the same standard thatis applied to fee requests under Section 55.
Filed March 11, 2010
Consequently, recovery under the ADA is the rule rather than the exception. Jbid. citing Herrington v. County ofSonoma, 883 F.2d 739, 743 (9th Cir. 1989). This is, incidentally, the same standardthat is applied to fee requests under Section 55.
Filed November 25, 2014
Gay Officers Action League v. Puerto Rico, 247 F.3d 288 (1st Cir. 2001). 14 Herrington v. County of Sonoma, 883 F.2d 739, 747 (9th Cir. 1989). 15 133 S.Ct. 2675 (2013).