From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Henry v. State

Supreme Court of Nevada
Apr 27, 1967
426 P.2d 791 (Nev. 1967)

Opinion

No. 5229

April 27, 1967

Appeal from Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Clarence Sundean, Judge.

Dorsey Harrington, of Las Vegas, for Appellant.

Harvey Dickerson, Attorney General, George E. Franklin, District Attorney, and James D. Santini, Deputy District Attorney, Clark County, for Respondent.


OPINION


The sole issue on appeal is whether the evidence was sufficient to sustain Henry's conviction for the illegal possession of a hypodermic syringe and needle for the purpose of administering subcutaneously habit-forming drugs to a human being in violation of NRS 453.125.

The defendant, Henry, contends that since the syringe and needle were found in his companion's purse there was not substantial evidence to show his possession at the time of his arrest.

The evidence shows that Henry and his girl friend lived together for a period of time at the place of arrest. Law officers testified that they observed the couple administer drugs to each other by means of a syringe and needle approximately two hours prior to the arrest. When the officers under the authority of a search warrant entered the premises, Henry and the woman were on the bed. The woman's purse containing the syringe and needle was on a table near the bed.

Such evidence substantiates the State's contention that Henry was in joint possession of the syringe and needle when they were found by the officers. See Williams v. People, 315 P.2d 189 (Colo. 1957); People v. MacArthur, 271 P.2d 914 (Cal. 1954); Gonzales v. People, 264 P.2d 508 (Colo. 1953); People v. Basco, 264 P.2d 88 (Cal. 1953); State v. Chin Gim, 47 Nev. 431, 224 P. 798 (1924). Where there is substantial evidence to support a verdict in a criminal case, the reviewing court will not disturb the verdict nor set aside the judgment. Terrano v. State, 59 Nev. 247, 91 P.2d 67 (1939).

The cases of Terrano v. State, supra, and State v. Chin Gim, supra, have been overruled as to other legal conclusions not in issue here. Whitley v. State, 79 Nev. 406, 386 P.2d 93, at Footnote 5 (1963).

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Henry v. State

Supreme Court of Nevada
Apr 27, 1967
426 P.2d 791 (Nev. 1967)
Case details for

Henry v. State

Case Details

Full title:ALTON CLARENCE HENRY, APPELLANT, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, RESPONDENT

Court:Supreme Court of Nevada

Date published: Apr 27, 1967

Citations

426 P.2d 791 (Nev. 1967)
426 P.2d 791

Citing Cases

Williams v. State

"Where there is substantial evidence in the record to support the verdict of the jury, it will not be…

Tellis v. State

We reject this contention, and we affirm the judgment of conviction. It has been well established that where…