Heichel
v.
Geico Indem. Co.

Not overruled or negatively treated on appealinfoCoverage
Supreme Court of Michigan.Dec 28, 2016
888 N.W.2d 84 (Mich. 2016)

Docket Nos. 153501 153502. COA Nos. 323818 324045.

12-28-2016

Adam HEICHEL, Plaintiff, and St. John Macomb–Oakland Hospital, Intervening Plaintiff–Appellee, and Mendelson Orthopedics, P.C., Intervening Plaintiff, v. GEICO INDEMNITY COMPANY, Defendant/Third–Party Plaintiff–Appellant, and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, Defendant–Appellant, and Ean Holdings, Inc. and Enterprise Holdings, Inc., Defendants/Third–Party Defendants–Appellees.


Order

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 1, 2016 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.