From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hearnes v. California Department of Corrections

United States District Court, E.D. California
Sep 1, 2006
No. CIV S-04-0198 GEB GGH P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 1, 2006)

Opinion

No. CIV S-04-0198 GEB GGH P.

September 1, 2006


ORDER


On June 23, 2006, plaintiff filed a request for a thirty day extension of time to serve discovery requests. Pursuant to the March 8, 2006, scheduling order, the discovery cut-off date was June 23, 2006. Plaintiff also requests that he be re-served with the scheduling order.

On August 14, 2006, defendants filed a motion for judgment on the pleadings. In light of defendants' motion, plaintiff's motion for an extension of time to conduct discovery is denied without prejudice. If defendants' motion is denied, plaintiff may file a motion to reopen discovery.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff's June 23, 2006, request for an extension of time to conduct discovery is denied without prejudice;

2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to re-serve plaintiff with the March 8, 2006, scheduling order.


Summaries of

Hearnes v. California Department of Corrections

United States District Court, E.D. California
Sep 1, 2006
No. CIV S-04-0198 GEB GGH P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 1, 2006)
Case details for

Hearnes v. California Department of Corrections

Case Details

Full title:SAMUEL D. HEARNES, JR., Plaintiff, v. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Sep 1, 2006

Citations

No. CIV S-04-0198 GEB GGH P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 1, 2006)