Head Ski Company
v.
United States

Not overruled or negatively treated on appealinfoCoverage
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth CircuitJan 26, 1972
454 F.2d 732 (4th Cir. 1972)

Cases citing this case

How cited

lock 6 Citing caseskeyboard_arrow_right

No. 71-1544.

Argued December 8, 1971.

Decided January 26, 1972.

Richard W. Perkins, Atty., Dept. of Justice (Fred B. Ugast, Acting Asst. Atty. Gen., Meyer Rothwacks and Stephen H. Hutzelman, Attys. Dept. of Justice, and George Beall, U.S. Atty., D. Md., and John G. Sakellaris, Asst. U.S. Atty., on brief), for appellant.

Edward S. Smith, Baltimore, Md. (Albert S. Barr, III, Paul V. Niemeyer, and Piper Marbury, Baltimore, Md., on brief), for appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland.

Before BOREMAN, Senior Circuit Judge, and BRYAN and BUTZNER, Circuit Judges.


The government appeals from the entry of summary judgment in favor of Head Ski Company granting a refund of income tax for 1965.

Head Ski Co. v. United States, 323 F. Supp. 1383 (D.Md. 1971).

The sole issue is whether a premium Head Ski paid for the redemption of a convertible note was deductible as a business expense or nondeductible as a capital outlay. Applying Treasury Regulation § 1.61-12(c)(1) (1965), the district court held that the premium was deductible. In reaching this conclusion, it relied primarily on Southwest Grease Oil Company, Inc. v. United States, 435 F.2d 675 (10th Cir. 1971), and Roberts Porter, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 307 F.2d 745 (7th Cir. 1962), which in their material aspects are indistinguishable. We affirm.

The transaction occurred before the effective date of 26 U.S.C. § 249 (1969), which contains a limitation on the deduction of a premium paid to repurchase convertible obligations.