Hazleton
v.
Lozano

Not overruled or negatively treated on appealinfoCoverage
U.S. Supreme CourtJun 6, 2011
563 U.S. 1030 (2011)
563 U.S. 1030131 S. Ct. 2958180 L. Ed. 2d 243

Cases citing this case

How cited

  • Preterm-Cleveland, Inc. v. Kasich

    …The majority's decision to ignore this well-established principle and require Preterm to show economic harm…

  • Doe v. Hobson

    …granted, judgment vacated sub nom. City of Hazleton, Pa. v. Lozano, 131 S. Ct. 2958, 180 L. Ed. 2d 243 (U.S.…

lock 4 Citing caseskeyboard_arrow_right

No. 10–772.

06-06-2011

CITY OF HAZLETON, PENNSYLVANIA, petitioner, v. Pedro LOZANO, et al.


On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. Petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit for further consideration in light of Chamber of Commerce of United States of America v. Whiting, 563 U.S. ––––, 131 S.Ct. 1968, 179 L.Ed.2d 1031 (2011).