Haynesv.State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourth District, San AntonioFeb 14, 2007
No. 04-06-00376-CR (Tex. App. Feb. 14, 2007)

No. 04-06-00376-CR

Delivered and Filed: February 14, 2007. DO NOT PUBLISH.

Appeal from the 144th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2006-CR-2808W, Honorable Mark R. Luitjen, Judge Presiding.

Alma L. López, Chief Justice, Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice, Rebecca Simmons, Justice.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


Opinion by: ALMA L. López, Chief Justice.

AFFIRMED Tamika R. Haynes pled true to violating her conditions of probation and was sentenced to two years in state jail. Haynes's court-appointed attorney filed a brief containing a professional evaluation of the record in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel concludes that the appeal has no merit. Counsel provided Haynes with a copy of the brief and informed her of her right to review the record and file her own brief. See Nichols v. State, 954 S.W.2d 83, 85-86 (Tex.App.-San Antonio 1997, no pet.); Bruns v. State, 924 S.W.2d 176, 177 n. 1 (Tex.App.-San Antonio 1996, no pet.). Haynes did not file a pro se brief. After reviewing the record and counsel's brief, we agree that the appeal is frivolous and without merit. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Appellate counsel's motion to withdraw is granted. Nichols v. State, 954 S.W.2d at 86; Bruns 924 S.W.2d at 177 n. 1.