From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hawkins v. United States

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.
Jul 31, 2013
725 F.3d 680 (7th Cir. 2013)

Opinion

No. 11–1245.

2013-07-31

Bernard HAWKINS, Petitioner–Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Respondent–Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Indiana, Hammond Division. No. 2:10–cv–00016–JTM—James T. Moody, Judge. On Petition for Rehearing En Banc. Julius L. Loeser, Attorney, James R. Thompson, Jr., Attorney, Thomas G. Weber, Attorney, Sean G. Wieber (argued), Attorney, Winston & Strawn LLP, Chicago, IL, for Petitioner–Appellant. Gary Bell, Attorney, David E. Hollar (argued), Attorney, Office of the United States Attorney, Hammond, IN, for Respondent–Appellee.


Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Indiana, Hammond Division. No. 2:10–cv–00016–JTM—James T. Moody, Judge.
On Petition for Rehearing En Banc.
Julius L. Loeser, Attorney, James R. Thompson, Jr., Attorney, Thomas G. Weber, Attorney, Sean G. Wieber (argued), Attorney, Winston & Strawn LLP, Chicago, IL, for Petitioner–Appellant. Gary Bell, Attorney, David E. Hollar (argued), Attorney, Office of the United States Attorney, Hammond, IN, for Respondent–Appellee.
Before EASTERBROOK, Chief Judge, and POSNER, KANNE, ROVNER, WOOD, WILLIAMS, SYKES, TINDER, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

POSNER, Circuit Judge.

The petition to rehear this case (decided February 7, 2013, in an opinion reported at 706 F.3d 820) en banc is denied. Judges Rovner, Wood, Williams, and Hamilton voted to grant rehearing en banc.

See also the supplemental panel opinion, issued today, which denies panel rehearing, together with a dissenting opinion by Judge Rovner.

ROVNER, Circuit Judge, with whom WOOD, WILLIAMS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, join, dissenting from the denial of rehearing en banc. I dissent from the denial of rehearing en banc for the same reasons set forth in my dissent from the denial of rehearing by the panel. I hereby incorporate by reference that dissent as a statement of the reasons why I believe the court should rehear this case en banc.

Circuit Judge Flaum took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.


Summaries of

Hawkins v. United States

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.
Jul 31, 2013
725 F.3d 680 (7th Cir. 2013)
Case details for

Hawkins v. United States

Case Details

Full title:Bernard HAWKINS, Petitioner–Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America,…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Date published: Jul 31, 2013

Citations

725 F.3d 680 (7th Cir. 2013)

Citing Cases

Cummings v. United States

After the Seventh Circuit issued Hawkins II, Hawkins requested rehearing en banc, which a divided panel…

Whiteside v. United States

There is much that could be said about the dissenting opinion's paean to finality, but one can hardly say it…