Hart
v.
State

Not overruled or negatively treated on appealinfoCoverage
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third DistrictJun 3, 1998
710 So. 2d 1047 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

Cases citing this case

How cited

  • J.R.V. v. State

    …See Latiif v. State, 711 So.2d 241 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998); § 924.051(1)(b), Fla. Stat. (1996 Supp.). See also…

lock 1 Citing casekeyboard_arrow_right

No. 97-1329

Opinion filed June 3, 1998. JANUARY TERM, A.D. 1998

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Dade County, Leslie B. Rothenberg, Judge. L.T. No. 96-15053.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Robert Kalter, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Terri Leon-Benner, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before COPE, GODERICH, and SHEVIN, JJ.


Jerome Hart appeals his conviction for burglary of an unoccupied conveyance and the order of restitution. We find no trial error and affirm the conviction.

Defendant-appellant contends that the evidence is insufficient to support the $500 restitution order. This claim is not properly preserved for appellate review, because it was not presented in the first instance in the trial court. See § 924.051(3), Fla. Stat. (Supp. 1996). Loring v. State, 674 So.2d 165, 168 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996); Gliszczynski v. State, 654 So.2d 579, 580 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995); Bayer v. State, 597 So.2d 870, 871-72 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992).

Affirmed.