Harris Rutsky Co. v. Bell Clements

1 Analyses of this case by attorneys

  1. Court of Appeal holds that California Court had personal jurisdiction over London insurance broker

    Carlton Fields Jorden BurtNovember 23, 2006

    In finding the exercise of personal jurisdiction over Sedgwick proper, the Court cited, as being of particular relevance, a Ninth Circuit case that dealt with personal jurisdiction over a London-based insurance broker. Harris Rutsky & Co. Ins. Serv., Inc. v. Bell & Clements, 328 F.3d 1122 (9th Cir. 2003). Swett & Crawford v. Sedgwick Group Ltd., Case No. B183940 (Cal.Ct.App. Oct. 11, 2006).