Harden
v.
State

This case is not covered by Casetext's citator
Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourteenth District, HoustonMay 20, 2004
No. 14-03-01053-CR (Tex. App. May. 20, 2004)

No. 14-03-01053-CR

Memorandum Opinion Filed May 20, 2004. DO NOT PUBLISH. Tex.R.App.P. 47.2(b).

On Appeal from the 338th District Court, Harris County, Texas, Trial Court Cause No. 950,684. Affirmed.

Panel consists of Justices YATES, ANDERSON, and HUDSON.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


After a jury trial, appellant was convicted of the offense of burglary of a habitation. On September 11, 2003, the trial court sentenced appellant to confinement for forty years in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. Appellant filed a written notice of appeal. Appellant's appointed counsel filed a brief in which he concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396 (1967), presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex.Crim.App. 1978). A copy of counsel's brief was delivered to appellant. Appellant was advised of the right to examine the appellate record and no pro se response has been filed. We agree the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. Further, we find no reversible error in the record. A discussion of the brief would add nothing to the jurisprudence of the State. Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.