From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

HAAS v. WARDEN, SCI SOMERSET

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Dec 7, 2010
CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-CV-183 (E.D. Pa. Dec. 7, 2010)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-CV-183.

December 7, 2010


ORDER


AND NOW, this __7th__ day of December 2010, upon consideration of the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Doc. 1), and after review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Lynne A. Sitarski (Doc. 10), and Petitioner's Objections to the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 12), it is hereby ORDERED that:

• The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED;
• The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DISMISSED;
• A certificate of appealability should not issue since, for the reasons set forth in the Report and Recommendation, petitioner has failed to show that a reasonable jurist could conclude that the Court is incorrect in dismissing the Petition.


Summaries of

HAAS v. WARDEN, SCI SOMERSET

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Dec 7, 2010
CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-CV-183 (E.D. Pa. Dec. 7, 2010)
Case details for

HAAS v. WARDEN, SCI SOMERSET

Case Details

Full title:GERALD J. HAAS, Petitioner, v. WARDEN, SCI SOMERSET, et al., Respondents

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Dec 7, 2010

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-CV-183 (E.D. Pa. Dec. 7, 2010)