From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gulf Oil Corp. v. Bogosian

U.S.
Feb 21, 1978
434 U.S. 1086 (1978)

Summary

holding no private right of action

Summary of this case from Banowitz v. State Exchange Bank

Opinion

No. 77-740.

February 21, 1978, OCTOBER TERM, 1977.


C.A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied. MR. JUSTICE STEWART and MR. JUSTICE POWELL took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition. Reported below: 561 F. 2d 434.


Summaries of

Gulf Oil Corp. v. Bogosian

U.S.
Feb 21, 1978
434 U.S. 1086 (1978)

holding no private right of action

Summary of this case from Banowitz v. State Exchange Bank

holding that notice sent out to current customers in regular monthly correspondence was fair, efficient, and fulfilled the purposes of the federal rule, however, holding that "former" customers must also receive individual notice if they were to be included in the class

Summary of this case from Northrup v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.

finding no implied cause of action

Summary of this case from Memphis Housing Authority v. Paine, Webber, Jackson & Curtis, Inc.

finding no private cause of action

Summary of this case from Smith v. Oppenheimer and Co., Inc.

rejecting implied remedy

Summary of this case from Wachovia Bank Trust v. Nat. Student Mktg

rejecting a § 17 cause of action

Summary of this case from Nelson v. Quimby Island Reclamation Dist.

discussing but reserving issue

Summary of this case from Brock v. Richland Shoe Co.

declining to recognize a private cause of action under § 17

Summary of this case from Welek v. Solomon

following Katz

Summary of this case from Continental Group, Inc.

construing the Equal Pay Act

Summary of this case from Marshall v. Gerwill, Inc.
Case details for

Gulf Oil Corp. v. Bogosian

Case Details

Full title:GULF OIL CORP. ET AL. v. BOGOSIAN ET AL

Court:U.S.

Date published: Feb 21, 1978

Citations

434 U.S. 1086 (1978)

Citing Cases

Zenith Radio Corp. v. Matsushita Elec. Indus.

Plaintiffs further allege that defendants agreed to engage in collusive predatory pricing, although without…

Little Caesar Enters., Inc. v. Smith

          The class plaintiffs need only show that all suffered some loss in their business, and that there…