This case is not covered by Casetext's citator
United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Pine Bluff DivisionMar 30, 2011
5:10CV00139 JMM/JTR. (E.D. Ark. Mar. 30, 2011)

5:10CV00139 JMM/JTR.

March 30, 2011


The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray and the filed objections. After carefully considering these documents and making a de novo review of the record in this case, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects.


1. Defendants' Motions for Summary Judgment (docket entries #96 and #99) are GRANTED, and this case is DISMISSED, WITHOUT PREJUDICE, due to Plaintiff's failure to timely and properly exhaust his administrative remedies.

2. The Court CERTIFIES, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order and the accompanying Judgment would not be taken in good faith.

An alternative to Lexis that does not break the bank.

Casetext does more than Lexis for less than $65 per month.