Philles Records

Court of Appeals of the State of New YorkOct 17, 2002
780 N.E.2d 166 (N.Y. 2002)
780 N.E.2d 166750 N.Y.S.2d 56598 N.Y.2d 562

Cases citing this case

How cited

lock 995 Citing caseskeyboard_arrow_right

Summaries written by judges


  • holding a "written agreement that is complete, clear and unambiguous on its face must be enforced according to the plain meaning of its terms"

    Summary of this case from Intermec, Inc. v. Int'l Bus. Machs. Corp.

  • finding extrinsic evidence admissible to interpret meaning of ambiguous contract terms

    Summary of this case from NUEVO REH. DE VIVIENDA v. MOREIGHT RLTY. CORP.

  • noting "[t]he fundamental, neutral precept of contract interpretation is that agreements are construed in accord with the parties' intent," and "[t]he best evidence of what parties to a written agreement intend is what they say in their writing."

    Summary of this case from U.S. Bank Nat'l Ass'n v. Triaxx Asset Mgmt. LLC

Analyses written by attorneys


1 Analysiskeyboard_arrow_right

No. 114

Decided October 17, 2002.

Judges Levine, Ciparick, Wesley and Rosenblatt concur. Chief Judge Kaye and Judge Smith took no part.

Order modified, without costs, by remitting to Supreme Court, for further proceedings in accordance with the opinion herein and, as so modified, affirmed.