From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Greater Hartford F. B. v. Greater Hartford

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Mar 31, 1959
265 F.2d 656 (2d Cir. 1959)

Opinion

No. 262, Docket 25462.

Argued February 13, 1959.

Decided March 31, 1959.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut; J. Joseph Smith, Judge.

The Greater Hartford Free Bridge Association appeals from a judgment dismissing its complaint for lack of jurisdiction, for failure to exhaust its administrative remedies, and for failure to present a justiciable controversy.

Leo Parskey, Hartford, Conn. (Parskey, Gross Kline, Hartford, Conn., on the brief), for plaintiffs-appellants.

John J. Kenny, Hartford, Conn. (F. Timothy McNamara, Hartford, Conn., on the brief), for defendant-appellee.

Before MEDINA, LUMBARD and WATERMAN, Circuit Judges.


Affirmed on the opinion below. 172 F. Supp. 244. In addition, we note that Section 209.210, Title 33, Code of Federal Regulations prescribes in detail the administrative remedy available to appellants.


Summaries of

Greater Hartford F. B. v. Greater Hartford

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Mar 31, 1959
265 F.2d 656 (2d Cir. 1959)
Case details for

Greater Hartford F. B. v. Greater Hartford

Case Details

Full title:GREATER HARTFORD FREE BRIDGE ASSOCIATION, Benjamin H. Manheim…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit

Date published: Mar 31, 1959

Citations

265 F.2d 656 (2d Cir. 1959)

Citing Cases

Wallace v. City of Rock Island

Those allegations impel the conclusion that plaintiff asserts no damage to himself and the class which he…

Wallace v. City of Rock Island

To establish jurisdiction over interpretation of the federal statute, there must have been a justiciable…