Grayv.Skolnik

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADAFeb 16, 2012
2:07-CV-01379-PMP-VCF (D. Nev. Feb. 16, 2012)

2:07-CV-01379-PMP-VCF

02-16-2012

MALCOLM L. GRAY, Plaintiff, v. HOWARD SKOLNIK, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Having read and considered Plaintiff Gray's Motion to Show Cause Why Plaintiff's Complaint Should Not Be Dismissed (Doc. #53), and Defendants' Response thereto (Doc. #55) and finding that Plaintiff has failed to serve the remaining undismissed Defendants in this action notwithstanding two extensions of time within which to do so, and finding further that Plaintiff has not met his burden of showing that good cause exists for his failure to timely serve the remaining named Defendants in this action, and good cause appearing,

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this action is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice.

_______________


PHILIP M. PRO


United States District Judge