From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gonzales v. Eisai, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
Oct 11, 2011
Case No. CV 11-02250 SC (N.D. Cal. Oct. 11, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. CV 11-02250 SC

10-11-2011

ANTHONY GONZALES, on behalf of himself and others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. EISAI, Inc.; and DOES 1 to 50, Inclusive, Defendants.

KINGSLEY & KINGSLEY, APC KELSEY PETERSON-MORE Attorneys for Plaintiff ANTHONY GONZALES MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS, LLP DARYL S. LANDY Attorneys for Defendant EISAI INC.


KINGSLEY & KINGSLEY, APC

ERIC B. KINGSLEY, SBN. 185123

KELSEY PETERSON-MORE, SBN. 260264

Attorneys for Plaintiff

ANTHONY GONZALES

MELINDA S. RIECHERT, SBN. 65504

DARYL S. LANDY, SBN. 136288

SHANNON B. NAKABAYASHI, SBN

215469

SHWETA GERA, SBN. 234627

MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP

Attorneys for Defendant

EISAI, INC.

[Case assigned for all purposes to the Honorable Samuel Conti, Courtroom 1]


JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE STAY OF PROCEEDINGS

Plaintiff Anthony Gonzales and Defendant Eisai, Inc., through their respective counsel, stipulate to as follows:

WHEREAS, this case was reassigned to the Honorable Jeremy Fogel on May 16, 2011.

WHEREAS, Judge Fogel held a Case Management Conference on July 29, 2011.

WHEREAS, Judge Fogel stayed proceedings in this matter during the July 28, 2011 Case Management Conference.

WHEREAS, this case was reassigned to the Honorable Samuel Conti on September 26, 2011 due to Judge Fogel's retirement.

WHEREAS, the Parties desire to continue the stay of proceedings ordered by Judge Fogel on July 29, 2011.

WHEREAS, the Court has set a Status Conference on February 24, 2012 10:00 am.

WHEREAS, the Parties shall file a Joint Statement seven (7) days prior to the Status Conference on or before February 17, 2011.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

KINGSLEY & KINGSLEY, APC

KELSEY PETERSON-MORE

Attorneys for Plaintiff

ANTHONY GONZALES

MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS, LLP

DARYL S. LANDY

Attorneys for Defendant

EISAI INC.

KINGSLEY & KINGSLEY, APC

ERIC B. KINGSLEY, SBN. 185123

eric@kingsleykingsley.com

KELSEY PETERSON-MORE, SBN. 260264

kelsey@kingsleykingsley.com

16133 Ventura Boulevard, Suite 1200

Encino, CA 91436

818.990.8300, Fax 818.990.8300

Attorneys for Plaintiff

ANTHONY GONZALES

MELINDA S. RIECHERT, SBN. 65504

DARYL S. LANDY, SBN. 136288

SHANNON B. NAKABAYASHI, SBN

215469

SHWETA GERA, SBN. 234627

MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP

2 Palo Alto Square

3000 El Camino Real, Suite 700

Palo Alto, CA 94306-2122

Tel: 650.843.4000

Fax: 650.843.4001

E-mails:

mriechert@ morganlewis.com

dlandy@ morganlewis.com

snakabayahsi@morganlewis.com

sgera@morganlewis.com

Attorneys for Defendant

EISAI, INC.

ANTHONY GONZALES, on behalf of himself and others similarly situated, Plaintiff,

vs.

EISAI, Inc.; and DOES 1 to 50, Inclusive, Defendants.

Case No. CV 11-02250 SC

[Case assigned for all purposes to the Honorable Samuel Conti, Courtroom 1]


[PROPOSED] ORDER ON JOINT

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE

STAY OF PROCEEDINGS

Good cause appearing, IT IS ORDERED that pursuant to the Parties' Joint Stipulation to Continue Stay of Proceedings, the stay of proceedings ordered by Judge Fogel on July 29, 2012 shall continue in effect, and that a Status Conference is scheduled for February 24, 2012, at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 1 of this Court, with the parties to file a Joint Statement at least seven days prior, or no later than February 17, 2012.

Judge Samuel Conti


Summaries of

Gonzales v. Eisai, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
Oct 11, 2011
Case No. CV 11-02250 SC (N.D. Cal. Oct. 11, 2011)
Case details for

Gonzales v. Eisai, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:ANTHONY GONZALES, on behalf of himself and others similarly situated…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Date published: Oct 11, 2011

Citations

Case No. CV 11-02250 SC (N.D. Cal. Oct. 11, 2011)

Citing Cases

Perkins v. Linkedin Corporation

As this Court has previously noted, “individuals may only be subjected to liability for acting ‘without…

In re Google Inc.

As such, plaintiffs cannot aggregate their alleged damages. In re iPhone Application Litig., No. 11–02250,…