From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Glenda v. Mariano

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 19, 2009
62 A.D.3d 536 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)

Opinion

No. 595.

May 19, 2009.

Order, Family Court, Bronx County (Alma Cordova, J.), entered on or about August 1, 2007, which declared respondent to be the father of the subject child, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Dora M. Lassinger, East Rockaway, for appellant.

Julian A. Hertz, Larchmont, for respondent.

Andrew H. Rossmer, Bronx, Law Guardian.

Before: Tom, J.P., Friedman, Catterson, Moskowitz and Renwick, JJ.


The record demonstrates that respondent had a long-standing sexual relationship with petitioner, including during the time of conception. Respondent acknowledged that the child, who is now 14 years old, calls him "Dad" and that he spoke to the child about his future. Respondent saw the child every few months and bought him clothing and he never attempted to dissuade the child from believing he was the father. Furthermore, the court interviewed the child, who informed the court that he knew respondent as his father and that he wished to have a closer relationship with him; there is no evidence or claim that any other person could be the father of the child.

Under these circumstances, where respondent assumed the role of a parent, albeit somewhat limited, and led the child to believe he was his father, the court properly concluded that the best interests of the child required that respondent be estopped from denying paternity ( see Matter of Sarah S. v James T., 299 AD2d 785). Respondent's reason for demanding a DNA test, to remove his doubts as to whether he was the father, is not a sufficient basis for ordering a DNA test, almost 13 years after the child's birth ( see Matter of Shondel J. v Mark D., 7 NY3d 320, 331-332). While the court should have reduced its decision to writing at the time (Family Ct Act § 418 [a]), its reasoning had to have been clear to respondent, who was present when the court made its fact-finding on the record ( see Matter of Tanesha H. v Phillip C, 57 AD3d 403).


Summaries of

Glenda v. Mariano

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 19, 2009
62 A.D.3d 536 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
Case details for

Glenda v. Mariano

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of GLENDA G., Respondent, v. MARIANO M., Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: May 19, 2009

Citations

62 A.D.3d 536 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 3944
880 N.Y.S.2d 18

Citing Cases

In re Smythe

Here, the hearing testimony demonstrated that the putative father and the child, who was 15 years old at the…

Shawn H. v. Kimberly F.

ent-teacher conferences, had telephone contact with the child, and saw the child on some of her birthdays.…