From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gissendanner v. State

Court of Appeals of Alabama
Jun 21, 1921
89 So. 835 (Ala. Crim. App. 1921)

Opinion

4 Div. 667.

June 21, 1921.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Dale County; J.S. Williams, Judge.

Brice Gissendanner, alias, etc,. was convicted of manslaughter in the first degree, and he appealed. Reversed and remanded.

Sollie Sollie, of Ozark, for appellant.

Brief of counsel did not reach the Reporter.

Harwell G. Davis, Atty. Gen., for the State.

Brief of counsel did not reach the Reporter.


On the trial of the case the wife of the deceased, over the timely objection of defendant, was permitted to testify that shortly before his death deceased had said "Bricie [meaning defendant] had robbed him." This testimony was not admissible for two reasons: First, no predicate had been laid for a dying declaration; Second, the statement was a conclusion. Pilcher v. State, 16 Ala. App. 237, 77 South, 75; Pressley v. State, 166 Ala. 17, 52 So. 337; Reaves v. State, 158 Ala. 5, 48 So. 373; Oliver v. State, 17 Ala. 587; Autrey v. State, 190 Ala. 10, 67 So. 237. Further, this evidence is not shown to be material.

The only effect of this evidence was to prejudice the defendant's case in the minds of the jury.

For the error pointed out, the judgement is reversed and the cause is remanded.

Reversed and remanded.


Summaries of

Gissendanner v. State

Court of Appeals of Alabama
Jun 21, 1921
89 So. 835 (Ala. Crim. App. 1921)
Case details for

Gissendanner v. State

Case Details

Full title:GISSENDANNER v. STATE

Court:Court of Appeals of Alabama

Date published: Jun 21, 1921

Citations

89 So. 835 (Ala. Crim. App. 1921)
18 Ala. App. 199

Citing Cases

Thomas v. State

ey v. State, 246 Ala. 359, 20 So.2d 519; Davis v. State, 245 Ala. 598, 18 So.2d 282. There was no sufficient…

Ratliff v. State

Details of the difficulty between defendant and the brother of deceased were not admissible in evidence in…