From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

General Communications Service, Inc. v. Georgia Public Service Commission

Supreme Court of Georgia
Nov 26, 1979
262 S.E.2d 96 (Ga. 1979)

Opinion

35010.

ARGUED SEPTEMBER 10, 1979.

DECIDED NOVEMBER 26, 1979. REHEARING DENIED DECEMBER 19, 1979.

Certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Georgia — 149 Ga. App. 466 ( 254 S.E.2d 710) (1979).

Troutman, Sanders, Lockerman Ashmore, Jeffrey R. Nickerson, for appellant. Martin H. Rubin, Charles E. Campbell, Arthur K. Bolton, Attorney General, L. Joseph Shaheen, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.


This court granted certiorari in this case, reported below at 149 Ga. App. 466 ( 254 S.E.2d 710) (1979), to determine whether Code Ann. § 9-605 and Superior Court Rule 39, Code Ann. § 24-3339 should be given a literal interpretation or whether these provisions are subject to the doctrine of estoppel. After hearing oral arguments and studying the briefs, we have determined that the doctrine of estoppel does apply and affirm the Court of Appeals. Stone Mountain Confederate Monumental Assn. v. Smith, 170 Ga. 515 (1) ( 153 S.E. 209) (1930); Beverly v. Flesenthall Bros., 142 Ga. 834 ( 83 S.E. 942) (1914); Boswell v. Gillen, 131 Ga. 310 ( 62 S.E. 187) (1908); Seals, Armour Co. v. Stocks, 100 Ga. 10 ( 30 S.E. 278) (1896); Bradshaw v. Gormerly, 54 Ga. 557 (1875); Peoples Credit Clothing Co. v. Scottish Union c. Ins. Co., 57 Ga. App. 747 ( 196 S.E. 99) (1938); Oliver v. Godley, 38 Ga. App. 66 ( 142 S.E. 566) (1928).

"Attorneys have authority to bind their clients in any action or proceeding, by any agreement in relation to the cause, made in writing, and in signing judgments, entering appeals, and by an entry of such matters, when permissible, on the dockets of the court; and attorneys, who are otherwise authorized by law to take affidavits and administer oaths, shall not be disqualified to take affidavits required of their clients in any matter or proceeding of any nature whatsoever."

"No consent or agreement between attorneys or parties will be enforced by the court, unless it be in writing, and signed by the parties to the consent, where such consent or agreement is denied by the opposite party."

Failure by a party to exercise a valuable legal right because of an agreement with the other party is detrimental reliance which creates equitable estoppel. See Pethel v. Waters, 220 Ga. 543 (4) ( 140 S.E.2d 252) (1965); Talley v. Atlanta Nat. Real Estate Trust, 146 Ga. App. 585 (5) ( 246 S.E.2d 700) (1978); Watkins Co. v. Rivers, 37 Ga. App. 559 ( 140 S.E. 770) (1927).

Judgment affirmed. All the Justices concur, except Nichols, C. J., Bowles and Marshall, JJ., who dissent.


ARGUED SEPTEMBER 10, 1979 — DECIDED NOVEMBER 26, 1979 — REHEARING DENIED DECEMBER 19, 1979.


Summaries of

General Communications Service, Inc. v. Georgia Public Service Commission

Supreme Court of Georgia
Nov 26, 1979
262 S.E.2d 96 (Ga. 1979)
Case details for

General Communications Service, Inc. v. Georgia Public Service Commission

Case Details

Full title:GENERAL COMMUNICATIONS SERVICE, INC. v. GEORGIA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION…

Court:Supreme Court of Georgia

Date published: Nov 26, 1979

Citations

262 S.E.2d 96 (Ga. 1979)
262 S.E.2d 96

Citing Cases

Adamson v. McDonald

Asserting that there was no evidence to support it, appellant enumerates as error the giving of a charge on…

Ware v. Renfroe

This Court finds such assertion entirely without merit and offensive to long-standing legal and equitable…