From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gayle v. Browder

Supreme Court of the United States
Jan 1, 1956
352 U.S. 903 (1956)

Summary

In Jordan v. United States, 352 U.S. 904, 77 S.Ct. 151, 1 L.Ed.2d 114, this court had ruled against Jordan's right collaterally to attack his conviction on a ground which he had failed to raise on his earlier appeal from the conviction.

Summary of this case from Lampe v. United States

Opinion

No Number in Original

Nov. 13, 1956.

Walter J. Knabe for appellants in No. 342. John Patterson, Attorney General of Alabama, and William N. McQueen and Gordon Madison, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellants in No. 343. Robert L. Carter and Thurgood Marshall for appellees in No. 343.


Per Curiam: The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483; Mayor and City Council of Baltimore v. Dawson, 350 U.S. 877; Holmes v. Atlanta, 350 U.S. 879.


Summaries of

Gayle v. Browder

Supreme Court of the United States
Jan 1, 1956
352 U.S. 903 (1956)

In Jordan v. United States, 352 U.S. 904, 77 S.Ct. 151, 1 L.Ed.2d 114, this court had ruled against Jordan's right collaterally to attack his conviction on a ground which he had failed to raise on his earlier appeal from the conviction.

Summary of this case from Lampe v. United States
Case details for

Gayle v. Browder

Case Details

Full title:No. 342. GAYLE ET AL., MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF…

Court:Supreme Court of the United States

Date published: Jan 1, 1956

Citations

352 U.S. 903 (1956)
77 S. Ct. 145
1 L. Ed. 2d 114
1956 U.S. LEXIS 199

Citing Cases

Bailey v. Patterson

"We have settled beyond question that no State may require racial segregation of interstate or intrastate…

Williams v. Hot Shoppes, Inc.

I think an affirmative answer is required by recognized principles which have evolved in Fourteenth Amendment…