Gasero
v.
Autozone, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIAJan 25, 2012
Case No. 2:10-cv-02761 JAM-CMK (E.D. Cal. Jan. 25, 2012)

Case No. 2:10-cv-02761 JAM-CMK

01-25-2012

ANTHONY GASERO (deceased), by and through his successor in interest, LINDA GASERO individually and as successor in interest, Plaintiff, v. AUTOZONE, INC., JIM KULBACKI and DOES 1-100, inclusive, Defendant.

MICHAEL HOFFMAN, Bar No. 162496 RONALD D. ARENA, Bar No. 218421 ARENA HOFFMAN LLP Attorneys for Defendant AUTOZONE, INC. LAWRANCE A. BOHM, (208716) BOHM LAW GROUP JOSEPH M. EARLEY III, (SBN 157400) LAW OFFICES OF JOSEPH M. EARLEY III Attorneys for Plaintiffs


MICHAEL HOFFMAN, Bar No. 162496


RONALD D. ARENA, Bar No. 218421


ARENA HOFFMAN LLP


Attorneys for Defendant AUTOZONE, INC.

LAWRANCE A. BOHM, (208716)


BOHM LAW GROUP


JOSEPH M. EARLEY III, (SBN 157400)


LAW OFFICES OF JOSEPH M. EARLEY III


Attorneys for Plaintiffs

STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING THE DEADLINES OF

THE STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) ORDER

Plaintiffs, by and through their attorneys of record, Lawrance A. Bohm and Joseph M. Earley, III, and Defendant, AUTOZONE, INC., by and through their attorney of record Michael Hoffman and Ronald D. Arena stipulate to modify this Court's Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Orde (Doc #10) of March 2, 2011.

I. EXISTENCE OF GOOD CAUSE

1. Good cause exists in that that the parties are discussing resolution of the dispute and may be able to avoid the burden and expense of pending depositions and related discovery.

2. Further good cause exists in that the date for the close of expert discovery was no previously provided by the Court.

3. Further, neither party would be prejudiced by the requested modification to the Court's Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Order.

II. STIPULATION

For the foregoing reasons, the parties to this action hereby STIPULATE AS FOLLOWS:

1. That the following modifications be made to the Court's Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Order:

+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+ ¦ ¦Previous Date: ¦New Date: ¦ +----------------------------------+----------------+-------------------------¦ ¦Non Expert Discovery Cut-Off ¦February 15, ¦February 29, 2012 ¦ ¦ ¦2012 ¦ ¦ +----------------------------------+----------------+-------------------------¦ ¦Expert Discovery Cut-Off ¦no date provided¦March 14, 2012 ¦ +----------------------------------+----------------+-------------------------¦ ¦Last day to file Dispositive ¦March 21, 2012 ¦April 4, 2012 ¦ ¦Motions ¦ ¦ ¦ +----------------------------------+----------------+-------------------------¦ ¦Last day Dispositive Motions heard¦April 18, 2012 ¦May 2, 2012 at 9:30 a.m. ¦ +----------------------------------+----------------+-------------------------¦ ¦JOINT Pretrial Statement ¦May 18, 2012 ¦June 8, 2012 ¦ +----------------------------------+----------------+-------------------------¦ ¦Final Pretrial Conference ¦May 25, 2012 ¦June 15, 2012 at 11:00 ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦a.m. ¦ +----------------------------------+----------------+-------------------------¦ ¦Jury Trial: ¦July 9, 2012 ¦July 23, 2012 at 9:00 ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦a.m. ¦ +-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

_____________________


MICHAEL HOFFMAN, ESQ.


RONALD D. ARENA, ESQ.


ARENA HOFFMAN LLP


Attorneys for Defendant AUTOZONE, INC.


_____________________


LAWRANCE A. BOHM, ESQ.


JOSEPH M. EARLEY, ESQ.


BOHM LAW GROUP


Attorneys for Plaintiffs


IT IS SO ORDERED:

_____________________


John A. Mendez


UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE