Not overruled or negatively treated on appealinfoCoverage
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth CircuitMay 2, 1969
409 F.2d 844 (5th Cir. 1969)

No. 24746.

May 2, 1969.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas; Joe W. Sheehy, Judge.

Richard B. Hardee, Asst. U.S. Atty., Tyler, Tex., Morton Hollander, Walter H. Fleischer, William Kanter, Attys., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., Carl Eardley, Acting Asst. Atty. Gen., William Wayne Justice, U.S. Atty., for appellant.

Theodore B. Sisco, McKinney, Tex., Bill M. McKnight, Larry Bach, Dallas, Tex., Sisco Sisco, McKinney, Tex., McKnight, Van Meter Dean, Larry B. Bach, Dallas, Tex., for appellee.

Before TUTTLE and GEWIN, Circuit Judges, and HUNTER, District Judge.

The court having, in the en banc rehearing of King v. Gardner, 5 Cir., 391 F.2d 401, 410, noted the amendment of the basic statute by P.L. 90-248, 81 Stat. 821 (approved January 2, 1968) Sec. 158(b), the judgment of the trial court is vacated and the case is remanded to that court for reconsideration of the record here in light of that amendment and this court's disposition of King v. Gardner.