From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Franklin v. Dickinson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 4, 2012
No. CIV S-11-2498 MCE CKD P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 4, 2012)

Opinion

No. CIV S-11-2498 MCE CKD P

04-04-2012

ROBERT D. FRANKLIN, Petitioner, v. KATHLEEN L. DICKINSON, Respondent.


ORDER

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, together with an application to proceed in forma pauperis. Examination of the in forma pauperis application reveals that petitioner is unable to afford the costs of suit. Accordingly, the application to proceed in forma pauperis will be granted. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a).

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner's application to proceed in forma pauperis is granted.

_________________

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Franklin v. Dickinson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 4, 2012
No. CIV S-11-2498 MCE CKD P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 4, 2012)
Case details for

Franklin v. Dickinson

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT D. FRANKLIN, Petitioner, v. KATHLEEN L. DICKINSON, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Apr 4, 2012

Citations

No. CIV S-11-2498 MCE CKD P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 4, 2012)