From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Foster v. Cole

United States District Court, E.D. California
Sep 22, 2010
No. 2:03-cv-1113 JAM JFM (PC) (E.D. Cal. Sep. 22, 2010)

Opinion

No. 2:03-cv-1113 JAM JFM (PC).

September 22, 2010


ORDER


On August 24, 2010, plaintiff filed a motion for reconsideration of the magistrate judge's order filed August 10, 2010, granting plaintiff's motion for an extension of time to file an appeal. Pursuant to E.D. Local Rule 303(f), a magistrate judge's orders shall be upheld unless "clearly erroneous or contrary to law." Upon review of the entire file, the court finds that it does not appear that the magistrate judge's ruling was clearly erroneous or contrary to law.

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon reconsideration, the order of the magistrate judge filed August 10, 2010, is affirmed.

DATED: September 22, 2010.


Summaries of

Foster v. Cole

United States District Court, E.D. California
Sep 22, 2010
No. 2:03-cv-1113 JAM JFM (PC) (E.D. Cal. Sep. 22, 2010)
Case details for

Foster v. Cole

Case Details

Full title:RONALD P. FOSTER, Plaintiff, v. SANDRA COLE, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Sep 22, 2010

Citations

No. 2:03-cv-1113 JAM JFM (PC) (E.D. Cal. Sep. 22, 2010)