From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fleissler v. Bayroff

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 9, 1999
698 N.Y.S.2d 19 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

November 9, 1999

Robin Nelson Wolfe, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.

Robert M. Milner, for Defendant-Respondent.

SULLIVAN, J.P., ROSENBERGER, LERNER, RUBIN, ANDRIAS, JJ.


Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Emily Goodman, J.), entered December 2, 1998, after a nonjury trial, in defendant's favor dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Plaintiffs' cause of action for legal malpractice was properly dismissed on the grounds that plaintiffs failed to establish the existence of an attorney-client relationship with defendant, a fellow investor, with respect to the real estate transaction at issue (see, Sucese v. Kirsch, 199 A.D.2d 718) and, in any event, failed to establish that defendant's conduct fell below the ordinary standard of practice in the legal community (see, Thaler Thaler v. Gupta, 208 A.D.2d 1130, 1132). Nor do we perceive any reason to disturb the trial court's conclusion that defendant made no contractual commitment to accompany the escrow agent to the bank (see, Pub. Serv. Mut. Ins. Co. v. Hollander, 228 A.D.2d 283, 285, lv denied 88 N.Y.2d 816). Because plaintiffs failed to establish that defendant owed them a duty, either as an attorney or by reason of a contractual undertaking, plaintiffs' negligence and breach of contract claims were properly dismissed. Plaintiffs' additional claim in arguing this appeal, that defendant owed them a fiduciary duty, is improperly raised for the first time on appeal.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

Fleissler v. Bayroff

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 9, 1999
698 N.Y.S.2d 19 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

Fleissler v. Bayroff

Case Details

Full title:LORRENCE FLEISSLER, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. BRUCE BAYROFF…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Nov 9, 1999

Citations

698 N.Y.S.2d 19 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
698 N.Y.S.2d 19

Citing Cases

Weadick v. Herlihy

Contrary to defendants' contention, it is immaterial whether plaintiffs imparted any confidences to the…

Shanley v. Welch

According to plaintiff, he sustained damages as a result of the vacatur of the separation agreement because…