From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fitzsimmons v. Stewart

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO
Feb 13, 2020
Civ. No. 2:18-CV-00069 KG/GJF (D.N.M. Feb. 13, 2020)

Opinion

Civ. No. 2:18-CV-00069 KG/GJF

02-13-2020

ANDREA FITZSIMMONS, Plaintiff, v. THOMAS STEWART, and STEWART INDUSTRIES INTERNATIONAL ROSWELL, LLC, Defendants.


ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AGAINST DEFENDANT THOMAS STEWART

THIS MATTER is before the Court on Plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment against Thomas Stewart on the statutory discrimination and equal pay claims under federal and state law and damages related to the statutory discrimination and equal pay claims under federal and state law. (Doc. 70). The Court finds that Defendant Thomas Stewart has not responded to Plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment despite having been provided notice of the motion for partial summary judgment and Plaintiff's February 3, 2020, notice of completion of briefing (Doc. 72) that provided notice to Defendant Thomas Stewart of his failure to respond to the motion for partial summary judgment.

Wherefore;

IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that Plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment be, and hereby is, granted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that damages are awarded in favor of Plaintiff, and against Defendant Thomas Stewart in the sum of $118,748.01.

/s/_________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Fitzsimmons v. Stewart

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO
Feb 13, 2020
Civ. No. 2:18-CV-00069 KG/GJF (D.N.M. Feb. 13, 2020)
Case details for

Fitzsimmons v. Stewart

Case Details

Full title:ANDREA FITZSIMMONS, Plaintiff, v. THOMAS STEWART, and STEWART INDUSTRIES…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

Date published: Feb 13, 2020

Citations

Civ. No. 2:18-CV-00069 KG/GJF (D.N.M. Feb. 13, 2020)