From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ferber v. Sterndent Corporation

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 7, 1980
412 N.E.2d 1311 (N.Y. 1980)

Summary

In Ferber, the Court of Appeals affirmed the lower court's grant of summary judgment in favor of the defendant because "[p]laintiff failed to produce any evidence to support his claim that the idea which he disclosed to defendants was novel either in the abstract or as to them."

Summary of this case from Nadel v. Play-By-Play Toys Novelties

Opinion

Argued September 2, 1980

Decided October 7, 1980

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, ANTHONY J. FERRARO, J.

I. Walton Bader for appellant.

Douglas M. Kraus and Miriam L. Siroky for respondents.


MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

As the court below found, plaintiff failed to produce any evidence to support his claim that the idea which he disclosed to defendants was novel either in the abstract or as to them. In order to successfully oppose a motion for summary judgment, plaintiff must come forward with some admissible proof that would require a trial of the material questions of fact on which his claim rests. Absent a showing of novelty, plaintiff's action to recover damages for illegal use of "confidentially disclosed ideas" must fail as a matter of law. (See Downey v General Foods Corp., 31 N.Y.2d 56.)

Moreover, prior to any alleged use of plaintiff's idea by defendants, two patents had been issued to unrelated third parties for devices which encompassed the very concepts plaintiff alleges he disclosed to defendants. Therefore, even if we were to assume that plaintiff's idea was novel when disclosed, all novelty was lost with the issuance of these patents because they caused plaintiff's idea to fall into the public domain. (See Platzman v American Totalisator Co., 45 N.Y.2d 910.) Therefore, summary judgment for defendants was properly granted.

Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and MEYER concur in memorandum.

Order affirmed.


Summaries of

Ferber v. Sterndent Corporation

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 7, 1980
412 N.E.2d 1311 (N.Y. 1980)

In Ferber, the Court of Appeals affirmed the lower court's grant of summary judgment in favor of the defendant because "[p]laintiff failed to produce any evidence to support his claim that the idea which he disclosed to defendants was novel either in the abstract or as to them."

Summary of this case from Nadel v. Play-By-Play Toys Novelties

noting that, even if plaintiff's idea were novel to the defendant at the time of disclosure, his claim would have been extinguished when the idea subsequently fell into the public domain through the issuance of patents disclosing the idea

Summary of this case from Nadel v. Play-By-Play Toys Novelties
Case details for

Ferber v. Sterndent Corporation

Case Details

Full title:JACK R. FERBER, Appellant, v. STERNDENT CORPORATION et al., Respondents…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Oct 7, 1980

Citations

412 N.E.2d 1311 (N.Y. 1980)
412 N.E.2d 1311
433 N.Y.S.2d 85

Citing Cases

Apollo Tech. v. Centrosphere Industrial

Matters of public or general knowledge in an industry cannot be trade secrets. Sheridan, 568 F. Supp. at 1352…

Nadel v. Play-By-Play Toys Novelties

By distinguishing between the two types of claims addressed in Downey and the different bases for rejecting…