From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Feiger v. Iral Jewelry, Ltd.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 24, 1977
41 N.Y.2d 928 (N.Y. 1977)

Summary

holding employee must lessen work or misuse employer secrets to constitute faithless servant

Summary of this case from Crowe v. Harvey Klinger, Inc.

Opinion

Argued February 11, 1977

Decided March 24, 1977

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, BEATRICE SHAINSWIT, J.

Barrett G. Kreisberg for appellant.

Arnold J. Ross for respondent.


MEMORANDUM.

Order affirmed, with costs.

One who owes a duty of fidelity to a principal and who is faithless in the performance of his services is generally disentitled to recover his compensation, whether commissions or salary (Restatement, Agency 2d, § 469). Nor does it make any difference that the services were beneficial to the principal, or that the principal suffered no provable damage as a result of the breach of fidelity by the agent (see Wechsler v Bowman, 285 N.Y. 284, 291-292, remittitur amd 286 N.Y. 582; Lamdin v Broadway Surface Adv. Corp., 272 N.Y. 133, 138-139). Nevertheless, on the findings of fact in this case, meticulously detailed by the court at trial, and affirmed at the Appellate Division, plaintiff was not guilty of any breach of fidelity during the term of his employment or engagement (see opn [ 85 Misc.2d 994] by Madam Justice BEATRICE SHAINSWIT at Supreme Ct). That plaintiff during his employment planned and took preliminary steps to enter into a competitive business involved no breach of fidelity so long as, as the courts below found as a fact, plaintiff never lessened his work on behalf of defendant and never misappropriated to his own use any business secrets or special knowledge (compare Jones Co. v Burke, 306 N.Y. 172, 188-189, with Reed, Roberts Assoc. v Strauman, 40 N.Y.2d 303, 308-309, and Leo Silfen, Inc. v Cream, 29 N.Y.2d 387, 391-392, 395).

Chief Judge BREITEL and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and COOKE concur in memorandum.

Order affirmed.


Summaries of

Feiger v. Iral Jewelry, Ltd.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 24, 1977
41 N.Y.2d 928 (N.Y. 1977)

holding employee must lessen work or misuse employer secrets to constitute faithless servant

Summary of this case from Crowe v. Harvey Klinger, Inc.

holding that a case for breach of fiduciary duty does not require provable damages but dismissing claims because defendant—a former employee—never misappropriated to his own use any business secrets or special knowledge

Summary of this case from Fed. Ins. Co. v. Mertz

holding that "[o]ne who owes a duty of fidelity to a principal and who is faithless in the performance of his services is generally disentitled to recover his compensation, whether commissions or salary"

Summary of this case from Consolidated Edison Co. v. Zebler

finding no faithlessness when the employee, despite taking preliminary steps to enter into competition with his employer "never lessened his work on behalf of the employer and never misappropriated to his own use any business secrets or special knowledge"

Summary of this case from Johnson v. Summit Acquisitions, LLC

finding that a plaintiff who plans and takes "preliminary steps to enter into a competitive business .. ." does not breach his duty of fidelity so long as the Court finds that "plaintiff never lessened his work on behalf of defendant and never misappropriated to his own use any business secrets or special knowledge."

Summary of this case from Hahn v. OnBoard, LLC
Case details for

Feiger v. Iral Jewelry, Ltd.

Case Details

Full title:KENNETH FEIGER, Respondent, v. IRAL JEWELRY, LTD., Appellant

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Mar 24, 1977

Citations

41 N.Y.2d 928 (N.Y. 1977)
394 N.Y.S.2d 626
363 N.E.2d 350

Citing Cases

Parker Waichman, LLP v. Mauro

In reviewing a determination made after a nonjury trial, the power of this Court is as broad as that of the…

Yukos Capital S.A.R.L. v. Feldman

New York's faithless servant doctrine holds that "[o]ne who owes a duty of fidelity to a principal and who is…