United States Government

This case is not covered by Casetext's citator
United States District Court, E.D. CaliforniaMay 8, 2006
No. 2:05-cv-2228-MCE-DAD-PS. (E.D. Cal. May. 8, 2006)

No. 2:05-cv-2228-MCE-DAD-PS.

May 8, 2006


Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed the above-entitled action. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 72-302(c)(21).

On April 11, 2006, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Plaintiff has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

Although it appears from the file that plaintiff's copy of the findings and recommendations was returned, plaintiff was properly served. It is the plaintiff's responsibility to keep the court apprised of his current address at all times. Pursuant to Local Rule 83-182(d), service of documents at the record address of the party is fully effective.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed April 11, 2006, are adopted in full; and

2. This action is dismissed without prejudice. See L.R. 11-110; Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b).

An alternative to Lexis that does not break the bank.

Casetext does more than Lexis for less than $65 per month.