From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Emrit v. Heck

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Jun 30, 2017
No. 17-1364 (4th Cir. Jun. 30, 2017)

Opinion

No. 17-1364

06-30-2017

RONALD SATISH EMRIT, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CONGRESSMAN JOE HECK, Defendant - Appellee.

Ronald Satish Emrit, Appellant Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Paul W. Grimm, District Judge. (8:17-cv-00074-PWG) Before MOTZ, THACKER, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ronald Satish Emrit, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Ronald Satish Emrit appeals the district court's order dismissing his civil complaint for improper venue. On appeal, we limit our review to the issues raised in Emrit's informal brief. Jackson v. Lightsey, 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014). We have reviewed the record in light of these arguments and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm substantially for the reasons stated by the district court. Emrit v. Heck, No. 8:17-cv-00074-PWG (D. Md. Jan. 26, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Emrit v. Heck

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Jun 30, 2017
No. 17-1364 (4th Cir. Jun. 30, 2017)
Case details for

Emrit v. Heck

Case Details

Full title:RONALD SATISH EMRIT, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CONGRESSMAN JOE HECK…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Jun 30, 2017

Citations

No. 17-1364 (4th Cir. Jun. 30, 2017)