From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ellis v. Campbell

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 6, 2007
No. CIV S-05-0316 FCD DAD P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 6, 2007)

Opinion

No. CIV S-05-0316 FCD DAD P.

August 6, 2007


ORDER


Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On July 6, 2007, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Petitioner has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed July 6, 2007, are adopted in full;

2. Respondents' December 6, 2006 motion to dismiss, or in the alternative, motion to stay proceedings, is denied; and

3. This action is dismissed as moot.


Summaries of

Ellis v. Campbell

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 6, 2007
No. CIV S-05-0316 FCD DAD P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 6, 2007)
Case details for

Ellis v. Campbell

Case Details

Full title:NATHAN ELLIS, Petitioner, v. ROSANNE CAMPBELL, et al., Respondents

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Aug 6, 2007

Citations

No. CIV S-05-0316 FCD DAD P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 6, 2007)

Citing Cases

Thomas v. Yates

Some courts have held that release on parole moots a habeas petition concerning denial of parole on the…