From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ehrlichman v. United States

U.S.
May 23, 1977
431 U.S. 933 (1977)

Summary

upholding conviction for conspiracy and pointing out that extensive (2,000 page) voir dire given.

Summary of this case from United States ex Rel. Means v. Solem

Opinion

Nos. 76-793, 76-1081.

May 23, 1977.


C.A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied. MR. JUSTICE REHNQUIST took no part in the consideration or decision of these petitions. Reported below: 181 U. S. App. D. C. 254, 559 F. 2d 31.


Summaries of

Ehrlichman v. United States

U.S.
May 23, 1977
431 U.S. 933 (1977)

upholding conviction for conspiracy and pointing out that extensive (2,000 page) voir dire given.

Summary of this case from United States ex Rel. Means v. Solem

upholding constitutionality of 18 U.S.C. § 1503, making it a crime to `[c]orruptly . . . endeavor to influence, intimidate, or impede any witness. . . .'

Summary of this case from Deehl v. Knox

affirming trial court's rejection of "content questions" on voir dire related to pre-trial publicity

Summary of this case from Mu'min v. Commonwealth

declining to review question certified on section 1292(b) appeal on the ground that matter was one of fact

Summary of this case from Sperling v. Hoffman-La Roche Inc.

submitting § 144 motions to fellow judges for decision is "at most permissive."

Summary of this case from Chitimacha Tribe of La. v. Harry L. Laws Co., Inc.

applying pre-1974 statute

Summary of this case from Roberts v. Bailar

noting that federal supervisory standards should apply to review of pretrial publicity issue in addition to constitutional due process standard

Summary of this case from U.S. v. Tokars

discussing the tangled skeins of Watergate "[M]ere narratives of past events are not admissible hearsay statements."

Summary of this case from Yaeger v. Murphy
Case details for

Ehrlichman v. United States

Case Details

Full title:EHRLICHMAN v. UNITED STATES; MITCHELL ET AL. v. UNITED STATES

Court:U.S.

Date published: May 23, 1977

Citations

431 U.S. 933 (1977)

Citing Cases

Brooks v. State

"Unless a venireman states unambiguously that he would automatically vote against the imposition of capital…

Yount v. Patton

Possibly even more prejudicial was the disclosure of petitioner's written confessions and his testimony at…