From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Egan v. Athol Memorial Hospital

U.S.
Nov 2, 1998
525 U.S. 964 (1998)

Summary

holding no special relationship existing between a parolee and his parole officer by which to create a duty on the officer to warn others about the parolee's status or propensities

Summary of this case from Lamb v. State

Opinion

No. 98-381.

November 2, 1998.


C.A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 134 F. 3d 361.


Summaries of

Egan v. Athol Memorial Hospital

U.S.
Nov 2, 1998
525 U.S. 964 (1998)

holding no special relationship existing between a parolee and his parole officer by which to create a duty on the officer to warn others about the parolee's status or propensities

Summary of this case from Lamb v. State
Case details for

Egan v. Athol Memorial Hospital

Case Details

Full title:EGAN v. ATHOL MEMORIAL HOSPITAL ET AL

Court:U.S.

Date published: Nov 2, 1998

Citations

525 U.S. 964 (1998)

Citing Cases

In re Pen Holdings, Inc.

See (some discussed below) P.A. Bergner Co. v. Bank One, Milwaukee, N.A. (In re P.A. Bergner Co.), 140 F.3d…

Harter v. United States

Doc. 25 at 9.Gragg v. Wichita State Univ. , 261 Kan. 1037, 934 P.2d 121, 128 (1997) ; see also, e.g.,South ex…