From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Durst v. Abrash

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Dec 30, 1965
17 N.Y.2d 445 (N.Y. 1965)

Summary

declining to compel arbitration of a claim arising under a usurious agreement

Summary of this case from Walters v. Fullwood

Opinion

Argued November 23, 1965

Decided December 30, 1965

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, JOSEPH A. SARAFITE, J.

Jules J.L. Hessen and Warren M. Weitzman for appellant.

Milton I. Newman and Paul R. Scott for respondent.


Order affirmed, with costs, upon the authority of the majority opinion at the Appellate Division. Question certified answered in the affirmative. No opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge DESMOND and Judges DYE, FULD, VAN VOORHIS, BURKE, SCILEPPI and BERGAN.


Summaries of

Durst v. Abrash

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Dec 30, 1965
17 N.Y.2d 445 (N.Y. 1965)

declining to compel arbitration of a claim arising under a usurious agreement

Summary of this case from Walters v. Fullwood
Case details for

Durst v. Abrash

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH DURST, Respondent, v. ANNE M. ABRASH, as Trustee under Trust…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Dec 30, 1965

Citations

17 N.Y.2d 445 (N.Y. 1965)
266 N.Y.S.2d 806
213 N.E.2d 887

Citing Cases

Port Washington Union Free Sch. Dist v. Port Washington Teachers Ass'n

Thus, for example, contract questions involving substantial issues of antitrust law, regulated directly by…

Rosenblum v. Steiner

The demand for arbitration commenced the arbitration proceedings (cf. City Trade Inds. v New Cent. Jute…