Duenasv.Getz

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTHJul 2, 2015
NO. 02-15-00142-CV (Tex. App. Jul. 2, 2015)

NO. 02-15-00142-CV

07-02-2015

CLAUDIA CALLEJAS DUENAS, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS NEXT FRIEND OF NATASHA PEDRAZA, MATTHEW PEDRAZA, AND CARLOS PEDRAZA APPELLANT v. ROBERT CHARLES GETZ, JR. APPELLEE


FROM THE 67TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY
TRIAL COURT NO. 067-263827-13
MEMORANDUM OPINION
AND JUDGMENT

On May 26, 2015, we notified appellant that the trial court clerk responsible for preparing the record in this appeal informed the court that payment arrangements had not been made to pay for the clerk's record as required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 35.3(a)(2). See Tex. R. App. P. 35.3(a)(2). We stated that we would dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless appellant, within ten days, made arrangements to pay for the clerk's record and provided this court with proof of payment.

Because appellant has not provided this court with proof of payment arrangements for the clerk's record, it is the opinion of the court that the appeal should be dismissed for want of prosecution. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b), 42.3(b).

Appellant shall pay all costs of the appeal, for which let execution issue.

PER CURIAM PANEL: LIVINGSTON, C.J.; DAUPHINOT and GARDNER, JJ. DELIVERED: July 2, 2015

See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.