From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dominick v. Astrue

United States District Court, N.D. California
Jan 15, 2008
Civil No. C07-03371 PJH (N.D. Cal. Jan. 15, 2008)

Opinion

Civil No. C07-03371 PJH.

January 15, 2008

SCOTT N. SCHOOLS, United States Attorney.

THEOPHOUS H. REAGANS, Assistant U.S. Attorney.

HARVEY P. SACKETT, Attorney for Plaintiff, ANTHONY DOMINICK.


STIPULATION AND ORDER


Plaintiff and Defendant, through their respective attorneys, hereby stipulate that Plaintiff shall have an extension of time of (30) days up through and including Monday, February 18, 2008 in which to e-file his Motion for Summary Judgment. This extension is necessitated by the number of other cases (12) Plaintiff's counsel currently has before the district court that also require briefing around this time period.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Dominick v. Astrue

United States District Court, N.D. California
Jan 15, 2008
Civil No. C07-03371 PJH (N.D. Cal. Jan. 15, 2008)
Case details for

Dominick v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:ANTHONY DOMINICK, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner, Social…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. California

Date published: Jan 15, 2008

Citations

Civil No. C07-03371 PJH (N.D. Cal. Jan. 15, 2008)