From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Doe v. City & Cnty. of San Francisco

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 25, 2012
NO. C10-04700 TEH (N.D. Cal. Jan. 25, 2012)

Opinion

NO. C10-04700 TEH

01-25-2012

JANE DOE and ANNE RASKIN, Plaintiffs, v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ON PLAINTIFFS' MOTION IN LIMINE NUMBER ONE

This motion came before the Court on January 10, 2012, on Plaintiffs' motion in limine number one, a motion to exclude the content of Jane Doe's emails from admission into evidence at trial. The Court finds that the content of the emails is more prejudicial than it is probative of any relevant issue in the case, particularly in light of the four witnesses for the defense who will be able to testify to the subject matter for which the emails were purportedly to be offered (i.e. an alternative theory for the Defendants' treatment of Plaintiffs). Therefore, under Federal Rule of Evidence 403, the emails shall be excluded. The Court GRANTS Plaintiffs' motion.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

_________________

THELTON E. HENDERSON, JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


Summaries of

Doe v. City & Cnty. of San Francisco

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 25, 2012
NO. C10-04700 TEH (N.D. Cal. Jan. 25, 2012)
Case details for

Doe v. City & Cnty. of San Francisco

Case Details

Full title:JANE DOE and ANNE RASKIN, Plaintiffs, v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 25, 2012

Citations

NO. C10-04700 TEH (N.D. Cal. Jan. 25, 2012)