DOAKES
v.
UNNAMED EMPLOYEES OF NOBLE CORRECTIONAL INST

This case is not covered by Casetext's citator
United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern DivisionSep 24, 2008
Civil Action 2:08-cv-00505. (S.D. Ohio Sep. 24, 2008)

Civil Action 2:08-cv-00505.

September 24, 2008


Order


Plaintiff has failed to respond to the Clerk of Court's May 13, 2008 letter advising him that he needed to submit a complaint, application to proceed in forma pauperis, civil cover sheet, summons, and USM-285 for each defendant. Plaintiff has failed to respond to the letter. He has not submitted a complaint, paid the $350 filing fee, or filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. Doakes has also failed to respond to the Court's August 25, 2008 Order to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for want of prosecution.

Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to enter JUDGMENT dismissing this case for want of prosecution. Rule 41(b), Fed.R.Civ.P. See, Link v. Wabash R. Co., 370 U.S. 626, 630-31 (1962). S.D. Ohio Civil Rule 55.1(c).